Category archive

Liberalism Exposed - page 2

Watch Wikileaks Founder Julian Assange Shut Down Bill Maher

in Liberalism Exposed

It seems political commentator Bill Maher has ignored the evidence and accused Julian Assange of working with the Russians and releasing the DNC hacked emails. Mr. Maher is clearly not a fan of Mr. Assange and attacked the whistleblower during his HBO show. Mr. Assange, no stranger to controversy, had his own bag-of-tricks and confronted Mr. Maher of another sort.

According to The Blaze:

Maher told Assange bluntly that it appears he is working with a “bad actor,” Russia, to take down Clinton, “the one person who stands in the way of us being ruled by Donald Trump.” He also asked why Wikileaks hasn’t targeted the Trump campaign’s emails.

After the audience’s applause died down, Assange shifted gears revealed he did a “little search” through their files and found an interesting item on a “William Maher.”

“I do notice that a William Maher gave a Clinton-affiliated entity $1 million,” Assange said. “Perhaps you would like to comment. Is that you?”

“I don’t think you have to look in your files to find that,” Maher replied sarcastically. “I gave Obama $1 million — I made it public. The whole point of it was to make it public so people in 2012 would understand that the game had moved to the million-dollar level after our Citizens’ United ruling.”

When Assange pressed Maher further, asking if there was another $1 million donation made to a Clinton group, the host replied, “F*** no.”

It’s interesting that many liberals like to attack those who reveal the truth. Apparently the facts get in the way of their narrative. Mr. Maher, who seemingly, portends to be an objective political pundit, is really just a Democratic hack seeking to further an agenda of entitlement and destruction.

It’s sad when heroes like Mr. Assange are attacked, even when they report 100% accurate information. More evidence of a ‘shoot-the-messenger’ culture rather than debating the content of the hacked emails.

Watch part of the interview below:

Sign of Things To Come? California City Says Surrender 4th Amendment Rights or Face Stiff Penalty

in Liberalism Exposed

California continues to set the standard in liberal absurdity with recent rules that force owners of rental property, and their tenants, of submitting to unlawful searches or face penalties. The draconian measures have been enacted in Highland California according to WND:

According to the filings from the Pacific Legal Foundation, at issue are the city’s “coercive” tactics in implementing a program for overseeing rental units.

“Instead of simply responding where there have been complaints about code violations, the city adopted the goal of aggressively inspecting all 4,800 rentals within city limits, whether or not there have been complaints,” the organization explained.

“To cut corners in this overwhelming task, officials are attempting to evade the Fourth Amendment requirement for obtaining administrative warrants to conduct inspections. Instead of going to a court and showing cause to receive such permission, the city is attempting to bully property owners and tenants into allowing inspectors in without a warrant.”

The case comes on behalf of Karl Trautwein and tenants in his rental properties.

“Police State USA: How Orwell’s Nightmare is Becoming Our Reality,” marshals the terrifying evidence to show the world of Big Brother is much closer than we want to admit.

He owns several homes and “takes pride in maintaining them to a high standard and keeping tenants satisfied, and he objects to baseless, uncalled-for intrusions by government bureaucrats,” the legal team explained.

But when he and the tenants in one of his rental homes in Highland refused an open-ended inspection of the property, the city issued a threat. Trautwein was charged a “re-inspection fee” and informed his rental license would not be renewed if he continued to refuse to allow a warrantless entry.

“The Fourth Amendment is a core constitutional protection for privacy and property rights,” said PLF attorney Wencong Fa. “The city of Highland is trying to strong-arm Mr. Trautwein and his tenants into surrendering this precious constitutional right, by holding Mr. Trautwein’s rental license hostage. Mr. Trautwein is being hit with what the law calls an ‘unconstitutional condition’ – either he and his tenants give up their Fourth Amendment protection from warrantless government invasion of their property, or Mr. Trautwein’s license to rent will not be granted.”

Fa said, “As our lawsuit points out, government cannot confront anyone with a false choice of this kind, which coerces them out of constitutional freedoms.”

Trautwein, in a statement released through his legal representatives, said, “With its crusade to inspect all rental properties, even those like mine without any tenant complaints, the city is wasting its resources, and harassing law-abiding people. Ironically, this is the kind of regulatory overkill that can reduce the supply of rental housing by causing conscientious and hard-working property owners to decide it’s not worth it.”

He continued, “Privacy means no one can come inside your residence unless you invite them in. Cities have no business forcing their way into people’s homes. The Constitution provides a way for government to enter a home – by convincing a judge to issue a warrant based on probable cause. Highland wants to avoid the inconvenience of that constitutional requirement.”

Trautwein said, “The rental business is like any other business. If a business does not take care of its customers, they won’t be in business. I take care of my residents by properly maintaining my properties. If I don’t, they will move somewhere else. So violating the privacy rights of my residents without probable cause is as unnecessary as it is wrong. My tenants are adults. They don’t need a government agency to tell them when something is wrong at the house. My tenants are smart enough to know when there is a problem. All they need to do is give me a call and it is taken care of.”

The case was filed in U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.

It’s another step in the erosion of property rights and individual liberties that faceless bureaucrats feel they can take away our Constitutional rights for convenience.

It’s not a stretch to see this extending to home owners and local government feeling they need to come into our homes to ‘protect us’ from threats. The real threat is the intrusive government.

What do you think? Leave a comment with your thoughts below.

A-List Actor Patriotic Tweet Draws Criticism and Swift Response

in Liberalism Exposed

Hollywood actor and conservative Rob Lowe send out a seemingly innocuous tweet in honor of veterans and Memorial Day when he didn’t expect the backlash a simple movie recommendation would draw.

According to Western Journalism:

Actor Rob Lowe is familiar with people disagreeing with his opinions; however, that doesn’t stop him from posting tweets that are met with negative responses.

Lowe posted such a tweet on Sunday when he recommended the movie 13 Hours, calling it the perfect Memorial Day movie.

When one person responded to the tweet by asking Lowe if he was “vying for the #2 slot on the Trump ticket,” Lowe responded:

Steven Crowder stated on Louder with Crowder that Memorial Day is a day to celebrate the American soldiers who lost their lives in service to their country; therefore, suggesting a movie portraying these heroes is not shocking.

While it does seem that Mr. Lowe is correct that everything seems to be politicized lately, he was quick to respond in a way to shame and silence the probable SJW who saw motive and insincere intent with his movie recommendation.

What do you think? Leave a comment with your thoughts below.

Watch Black Lives Matter Activists Get Put In Their Place By Conservative Speaker

in Liberalism Exposed

The tables seem to be turning on Black Lives Matter and other Social Justice activists as evidenced the other day when a conservative personality put them in their place after an attempted disruption to a speech he was making.

According to The Blaze:

Provocative conservative personality Milo Yiannopoulos’ speech at American University on Thursday was briefly interrupted by Black Lives Matter protesters, who hurled profane accusations of racism and “white supremacy.”

“F*** Donald Trump,” one protester screamed.

“F*** white supremacy,” another shouted.

Yiannopoulos informed the audience that the time for questions had come to an end, but said he would be “very happy” to talk to the protesters following his appearance. The offer didn’t seem to appease the protesters. It wasn’t clear from video footage what question the protesters actually wanted answered.

“That’s white supremacy right there, won’t even give him the f***ing mic!” one of the protesters replied.

Rather than give in to the Black Lives Matter demonstrators’ outspoken demands, Yiannopoulos explained to them why they would not be receiving any “special treatment.”

“I’m very happy to talk to you if you’d like to come up here at the end with everybody else, wait your turn and treat others with the same respect that they have treated you,” Yiannopoulos said matter of factly. “Nobody else is standing up and demanding special treatment. … The questions are over.”

He added, “You’re demanding to be heard on the basis of what? If I don’t answer a question I’m racist?”

Yiannopoulos then calmly ended the event and stated his intention to return in five minutes to meet with people after his speech.

What’s interesting is why other speakers and Presidential Candidates hadn’t responded as well as Mr. Yiannopoulos. His response was tasteful, respectful and empowered.

The BLM activists only have name-calling and profanity as weapons so it doesn’t take much to stand up to them. Yet unfortunately, not many have been willing to stand up to them.

What do you think? Leave a comment with your thoughts below.

Watch the video below (Warning: Very strong language):

Defiant HS Football Coach Fired For Praying Before Games Returns Fire In Big Way

in Liberalism Exposed

The US Government is actively involved in bringing Islamic refugees into the Country, even as many of these same refugees have taken part in killing Christians in their homeland. And many Christians in the US are being silenced and told not to demonstrate their faith in public. Well, that became too much for one football coach in Washington State. Joe Kennedy is not okay with the school district infringing on this 1st Amendment rights and he’s taking on the very school district that placed him on leave.

According to The Blaze:

The defiant high school football coach who was placed on paid administrative in October after refusing to stop praying on the field has filed a charge of religious discrimination with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission against the Bremerton School District.

In a statement issued on Monday, Joe Kennedy charged that the school district, located in Washington state, impeded his First Amendment rights with a ban on his silent prayers at the 50-yard line. The EEOC complaint is the last step before Kennedy could file a lawsuit against the school district — something that his attorneys have said they’re willing to do if an agreement isn’t reached.

“[Bremerton officials] violated my rights to free exercise of religion and free speech by prohibiting my private religious expression,” Kennedy said in a statement issued through his attorneys with the Liberty Institute, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Oldfield & Helsdon, PLLC, and attorney Anthony J. Ferate.

The lawyers pushed back against the district’s continued ban on Kennedy’s silent prayers at the 50-yard line, with Rebekah Ricketts, an attorney with Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, saying that she’s hopeful that Kennedy’s “First Amendment rights will be vindicated.”

As TheBlaze previously reported, Kennedy was suspended on Oct. 28, after he failed to come to an agreement with district officials over the on-field prayers that he had issued without incident since 2008. Bremerton School District superintendent Aaron Leavell had previously warned Kennedy about the invocations, informing him of the suspension in a letter.

“Effective immediately, pending further District review of your conduct, you are placed on paid administrative leave from your position as an assistant coach with the Bremerton High School football program,” Leavell wrote, according to conservative commentator Todd Starnes. “You may not participate, in any capacity, in BHS football program activities.”

This letter to Kennedy came just five days after the coach received another note from the superintendent in which the district denied a request for a religious accommodation that would allow him to continue on-field prayers.

That earlier letter, which followed Kennedy’s October 16 decision to once again pray again on the field, threatened discipline and potential firing if the prayer practice continued, according to Kennedy’s lawyers at the Liberty Institute, a conservative legal firm.

While he typically goes on the field to pray alone, students and players often voluntarily join Kennedy — and that is what has sparked controversy and concerns over the separation of church and state.

In a time when Political Correctness seems to be the norm, more and more people are speaking up and, in one way or the other, saying it’s not okay to silence us or our faith. It’s inspiring to see Joe Kennedy demand protection under the 1st Amendment, the same protection being given out liberally to Muslims and other non-Christians. Men and women like him are the everyday heroes that bring change through little actions that get publicity.

What do you think of the school district’s actions? Leave a comment with your thoughts below.

Unbelievable: Watch CNN Anchor Say Islam Is Not Much Different Than This Religion

in Liberalism Exposed

Sometimes you have to see it to believe it, especially when it comes to a CNN anchor excusing away Islams treatment of women and Sharia law. It happened when the CNN host felt Islam was being insulted and immediately came to its defense by saying Catholicism is not much different. According to The Blaze:

Rev. Franklin Graham calmly and bluntly stated his opinion that Islam is not “compatible” with American values during a CNN interview on Tuesday. In response, CNN anchor Carol Costello took a swipe at her own religion of Catholicism.

“Is Islam compatible with American values?” Costello asked.

“I don’t think so,” Graham replied.

Costello immediately shot back, “But see they would say that rhetoric like that is hurting them.”

“Well, you asked me a question and I answered you,” Graham said. “I don’t go out and preach against Islam…but our Constitution — the way we treat women, the way we treat all people — Islam doesn’t do that under Sharia law.”

Costello then seemingly compared Catholicism to Islam in terms of its treatment of people.

“I could argue that about my own faith within Catholicism, right? I could,” she said.

It’s incredible to believe the anchor truly feels Sharia law is similar to Catholicism. I don’t believe the Catholic faith calls for stoning women who’ve been raped, or requiring they walk outside their homes with a bag on their heads.

The interesting thing is why does the left make excuses for radical Islam? Why are they welcoming in their oppressors? If Sharia law was implemented in the US, many of them would be out of work, and most likely stoned or killed. Sometimes you have to see it to believe it, and in this case, no matter how many times I see it, I can’t believe it.

What do you think? Is Islam and Sharia law similar to Catholicism? Leave a comment with your thoughts below.

You can watch the exchange here:

Campus PC Police Want to Change The Name of This Building – But There’s One Big Problem

in Liberalism Exposed

Many Americans over 40 can remember that colleges and universities used to be the home of diversity and radical opinion. It was the environment where students went on philosophical exercises, trying on different opinions, viewpoints and experiences. It was about finding yourself and growing through the experience.

But now campus life is filled with repression from political correctness and students at a college in Pennsylvania are seeking to rename a building whose name hurts their feelings. According to The Blaze:

Like many students across the country of late, those at Pennsylvania’s Lebanon Valley College are telling administrators they want changes on campus that address discrimination and recognize and assist minority, disabled, gay and transgender students.

It’s in that spirit that some Lebanon Valley students are targeting one particular building on the Annville campus, saying its moniker calls to mind an element of America’s racist past.

But the caveat with altering the name of Lynch Memorial Hall?

It’s named after an actual person — Depression-era school President Dr. Clyde A. Lynch.

As you might expect, reaction to this demand — among others — presented to officials at the private school on Friday has been a bit brutal, PennLive reported.

“This is absurd. I’m all about being inclusive and bringing diversity to the Valley, but this is illogical, irrational, and ridiculous,” PReichelderfer commented on PennLive. “It is self-caricature. President Lynch got the Valley through one of its darkest periods and died serving the college he loved. It’s Lynch Memorial Hall; anyone who would think that has anything to do with lynching is an abject fool.”

“Good grief… As a graduate of LVC, I apologize for this foolishness (the Lynch building name change issue),” wishfulthinking commented. “The thought that Mr. Lynch’s name (that incidentally has absolutely nothing to do with the horrors inflicted upon African Americans) is somehow offensive, is absurd, poorly thought out, and clearly arises from a fevered imagination.”

But not everyone expressed outrage over the name-change demand.

PennLive commenter 11223344 called the protesting students “my highly intelligent and brave former classmate(s) who are simply trying to improve my alma mater. Please do not spread your hatred upon a situation you do not even know.”

One compromise the students are willing to make is adding the former president’s first name and middle initial to the “Lynch” name, PennLive reported.

“Out of all the things that we brought up, that upsets me that that’s the one focus,” Trey Manning, a member of the school’s Black Student Union, told WHP-TV.

Manning was one of the students who presented the list of demands — which also include more effective ways to deal with hate crimes on campus and more minorities in the school’s administration — to officials.

What’s interesting is the apparent lack of research that went into these demands. A simple review of the plaque, dedication or school history would have revealed Clyde Lynch as an honorable and worthy recipient of having a building named after him. But, because students who have no clue what a “lynching” is, nor have dealt with true oppression, find the time and energy to protest the renaming of a building.

Such ignorance and intolerance is being passed as education, and hard-working Americans are spending sizable amounts of money to fill their children’s head with such nonsense. It’s time for colleges and universities to bring back true diversity, true freedom and expand the minds of our youth – not retard it with hurt feelings.

What do you think? Should the buildings be renamed? Leave a comment with your thoughts below.

NY Daily News Columnist Shaun King Makes Bizarre Accusation Against Gun Owners in Rant That Would Get Conservative Columnist Fired!

in Liberalism Exposed

If a white person tweeted what this columnist, and Black Lives Matter leader, they would find themselves out of a job quicker than you can say ‘racism.’ So, why there hasn’t been more calls for columnist Shaun King to be fired is shocking.

It happened in response to a tweet of a picture showing an anti-gun editorial with bullet holes in it. According to The Blaze:

New York Daily News columnist Shaun King went on an unhinged rant against white gun owners Saturday, suggesting their ownership of firearms was “compensation for small penises & low sex drive.”

King, who is considered to be one of the top leaders in the Black Lives Matters movement, went on his tirade after seeing a tweet from Red State editor Erick Erickson. In his tweet, Erickson announced he had fired several rounds of bullets into a controversial New York Times editorial demanding strict gun control.

“Speechless at this tweet,” King wrote. “Conservative white men are scared of the New America that they shoot newspapers.”

The Daily News columnist then suggested white males own guns because of low sexual self-esteem.

King’s tweets come after the Daily News published two controversial covers in the aftermath of the San Bernardino attack. One blamed Republican presidential hopefuls for offering prayers as the tragedy unfolded and another called an NRA executive a “terrorist.”

What’s interesting is the self-incrimination aspect of all this. MacBeth said “Methinks he doth protests too much.” The fascination with sex organs that Mr. King shares, tells us a little more of where his mind is, and what he’s focused on. And it’s not pretty.

Add to that another liberal calling an NRA executive a ‘terrorist’, when we know the real terrorists are those trying to take our guns.

It makes for interesting viewing as you watch those who scream the loudest are really self-incriminating. That should give your eye a twinkle the next time you watch or read the news.

What do you think of Mr. King’s rants? Leave a comment with your thoughts below.

Watch: Turns Out College “Safe Spaces” Aren’t So Safe – Even For Minorities

in Liberalism Exposed

With all the protests on campuses around the country last week, many Americans are wondering if race relations are really as bad as protesters are claiming? But, one has to wonder if this is really about race, or about claiming title to victim status which seems so prized in today’s society.

At a private California college the other day, an Asian student walked into the “safe space” to point out that is fundamentally obvious to thinking people; that it’s not about the color of your skin, but about the content of your character. Whoa, that is not what the aspiring victims wanted to hear. According to The Blaze:

The scene unfolded at Claremont McKenna College when the unidentified female student stepped into the circle to express her opinion.

The woman told a story about how she was discriminated upon when she first came to the U.S. for her trouble speaking English. She recalled a moment a black man once told her to “go back to your home.” She said a “white lady” then checked on her to make sure she was OK.

“The point I’m making here is we should not distinguish people by their race or gender or anything. Black people can be racist!” the student said.

Almost immediately, a black female student confronts her and seemingly tries to stop her from talking as audible groans and murmurs are heard in the background.

“I just mean that we have to look at people individually,” the Asian student continues as the students turn against her.

Eventually another student takes the megaphone from the Asian student who leaves the “safe space” appearing a bit distraught.

The incident comes as racial tensions escalate on college campuses across the U.S. On Thursday, Claremont McKenna’s dean of student life resigned amid racial controversy.

On Wednesday night, student protesters at the University of Missouri segregated white supporters so they could form a “black only” space.

It turns out, when pushed, the students showed their true colors with the “black only” space. It seems that discrimination and segregation is bad if it is directed at blacks, asians or others claiming special treatment. But, apparently it’s okay if directed against whites.

These are truly strange times. What do you think? Was the Asian student right? Leave a comment with your thoughts below.

You can watch what happened below:

Public School Says Discrimination OKAY As Long As It’s Against This Group

in Liberalism Exposed

Just went you thought the public schools couldn’t get more bizarre, comes word out of Texas of officials holding “black-only” and “Asian-only” segregated meetings with students – no whites allowed.

It happened when a Texas mom found out from her daughter – not the school – that her middle school were holding meetings for students of certain races, and not allowing other races – particularly white student – from attending.

According to The Blaze:

It’s unclear what exactly happened during the event, but Kluk said she was informed by her daughter that students left the meeting saying they were “black and proud.” Disturbed by what she was told, Kluk went and talked with an assistant principal, who told her the meeting was for “academic purposes” because some students felt they were being treated unfairly.

“You’re telling me that Klein Oak High School hired teachers that do not treat black students like other students?” Kluk said she asked the assistant principal.

Kluk said the assistant principal assured her that wasn’t the case, but added that students have a “perception” they’re being treated differently.

“She kept using the word perception,” Kluk emphasized.

But it wasn’t just black students who were singled out, Kluk added. Hispanics students had their own meeting, separate from the one that took place with the black students. She said there was no such meeting for white students.

“My daughter, who is half Asian, asked if she could go inside to the meeting, and the person guarding the door told her she had to be at least 50 percent African-American,” Kluk told TheBlaze.

Kluk said she also learned that the school is considering “special academic field trips,” where students of certain races take “segregated” field trips.

The assistant principal reportedly asked Kluk if she had a problem helping minority students.

“I have a problem when students of any race are segregated,” Kluk told TheBlaze she responded.

The good news about this type of conduct is that it highlights the absurdity of conduct at public schools and begins to expose parents to the true indoctrination their children are going through – at their own expense.

Just like events at the University of Missouri last week, we see a radicalized agenda being promoted for the sake of political correctness. Since when did someone being ‘offended’ become the law of the land? Well, it’s looking like parents are waking up to the depravity happening in our school and University systems, perhaps the systems will start to collapse.

What do you think? Is this acceptable behavior for a school? Leave a comment with your thoughts below.