sign

Trump: ‘9th Circuit did it again’

in Important Issues

President Trump again went after the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals early Tuesday after it ruled against the president’s so-called travel ban.

“Well, as predicted, the 9th Circuit did it again,” Trump tweeted.

“Ruled against the TRAVEL BAN at such a dangerous time in the history of our country. S.C.,” he added, referring to the Supreme Court.

The California-based court on Monday affirmed in large part the Hawaii District Court ruling blocking parts of the order, which temporarily banned nationals from six Muslim-majority countries from entering the U.S., suspended the entry of all refugees and reduced the cap on the admission of refugees from 110,000 to 50,000 for the 2017 fiscal year.In a unanimous ruling Monday, a three-judge panel on the court said Trump’s revised order does not offer a sufficient justification to suspend the entry of more than 180 million people on the basis of nationality.

Trump earlier this month renewed the debate over his order in the wake of a terrorist attack in London. In a series of tweets following the London attack, the president referred to his order as a “travel ban” and insisted it was necessary to keep the U.S. safe.

On Monday, the judges cited Trump’s tweets in their ruling.

The Trump administration earlier this month asked the Supreme Court to step in.

The Department of Justice filed two emergency applications asking justices to block rulings halting the ban and to review its case.

 

Read More

 


source: http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/337535-trump-9th-circuit-did-it-again

  • Dave Harmon

    Look, just like the liberal attacks and Lies, it will not stop until we the real people fight fire with fire, take back our judicial systems. NO MORE BIAS JUDGES. they must follow the law not personal wants or bought off ways. If they do, FIRED. NO BENEFIETS and can never be in any type of law in the USA again. If their actions were bad enough, then Jail time in a REAL prison not home or a resort. Judges are not GODS. They must follow the law and constitution of this country. Also, should not be allowed to have any affiliations with groups or political agendas. Like ACLU, MECCA, La Raza, etc.

  • PHIL TRIMMER

    Hopefully The Muslim community will target the 9th Circuit court as there next target. Then maybe they will get it. The political correctness of the left are going to get people KILLED. It seams to me , that to be appointed to the court, you should be intelligent. Well, the best laid plans of mice and men…..

  • Lance Wakefield

    YES, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals did it again: They followed the Dictates of that Document, which was drafted by the “founders” of Our Federal Constitution, that FORBIDS any discrimination, based on “race,” “religion,” or “nationality,” for anyone wishing to enter the United States of America. “King Trump” must detest the “Founding Fathers” for their roles in writing that document!

    • PAproFirearms

      COMPLETE misunderstanding of the Constitution! You DO Realize that Obama had set this all up earlier? Also, since fully 80% of Muslim nations NOT affected, it is NOT a religious discrimination case. WAIT until SCOTUS reverses all this! THEN we will see who knows Constitutional Law! Hint: google Alan Dershowitz for his views, too!

      • Lance Wakefield

        President Obama was NEVER reversed, so why are you bringing him into “King Trump’s understanding of our Constitution? When I was in Law School, I had a GREAT law school Professor who went into the “limits” of the “executive branch”
        powers. Also, I don’t need Alan Dershowitz to teach me anything, regarding Our Constitution. I really want to thank you for putting in your 2 cents worth, but that is all it’s worth.

        • PAproFirearms

          Obama was mentioned because he was suggesting setting up travel bans from those very SEVEN countries where Trump tried to enforce his first ban! Check it out. I DO think Dershowitz knows a bit more than you OR your law school professor, OK? Be sure and post when SCOTUS overturns these outrageous rulings! And, please remind yourself of the 9th “Circus” reversal percentages!

          • Lance Wakefield

            President Obama was a Harvard Law School Professor, as well as “editor” of their “law school review.” This man didn’t bother “setting up travel bans,” because he knew what would happen.
            President Trump should’ve asked Alan Dershowitz, or someone similar what would happen in the U.S. Courts, if he embarked on such a quest. I honestly believe that the SCOTUS will follow in the path of the other appellate Courts, not just the 9th, and rule the same way. We shall soon see!

          • PAproFirearms

            Obama DID mention banning and vetting from the original 7 countries! POTUS is allowed to do ANYTHING to protect the US Citizenry! As to Obama’s “law experience,” NOBODY knows anything about him—other than the “party line” put out by sycophants! But, Dershowitz thinks SCOTUS will reverse Circuit Courts, too! As you said, we shall see. The 9th was “interpreting” the law, not RULING on the legality. Not cool to attempt to “discern” the thinking behind that what is legally written down, eh?

          • Lance Wakefield

            I really “suggest” that you GOOGLE “Did President Obama graduate (HLS) Harvard Law School?”
            It will STOP any confusion for you, as it did for me. Thank YOU!

          • PAproFirearms

            I have NO problem with Obama’s being graduated from Harvard Law, OR the other schools he supposedly attended and HOW he managed to pay or register at them, BUT, I would posit that YOU have NO CLUE to his grades, how he applied (foreign student) or any OTHER pertinent info, because, his entire educational records are SEALED! Columbia will NOT release any info. WHY? What is SO SECRET? Please let me know. My educated guess, because he LOOKS foreign, he registered/applied as a foreign student to get a better tuition break. (I had a friend who did this: looked like an Indian [The American kind] and registered at a state school as native American.) It is not uncommon, and I even have no problem with it—BUT, if you DO really know ANYTHING about the former POTUS, PLEASE publish in a newspaper! No confusion, other than his BC, and how everything pertaining to that is also lost or sealed!

          • Lance Wakefield

            The main point being: That he was accepted at Harvard, and his “fellow students” ELECTED HIM President of The Harvard Law Review, and his Professors there, rated him as OUTSTANDING!
            I know much of what that entails. HOW did this fellow come from nothing, then rise to President of the U.S.A?

          • PAproFirearms

            All of what you said is TRUE, BUT……WHY spend several MILLION dollars to HIDE and SEAL all pertinent info?? Also, HOW he got elected to both positions can be attributed to racism AND White Guilt from liberals! I do NOT know any professors who called him “outstanding.” Bottom line: WHY seal/hide everything? There was also an excellent article stating that nobody at Columbia even said that they knew him.
            What STARTED this thread was that the 9th blasted Trump for doing what Obama started!! And THAT is what’s going to be REVERSED, like 86% of ALL 9th Circus Decisions!

          • Lance Wakefield

            1) Who spent millions of dollars to hide what?
            2) Why does Trump want to secret his “tax returns?”
            3) How many Harvard lawyers do you know, that are suffering from “white guilt?”
            4) I’ve personally read two critiques from Harvard “Professors,” that “classified” Obama as an “OUTSTANDING” scholar. Please see the critique by Professor Laurence Tribe, noted Harvard Professor, and I read a 2nd critique from another Harvard Professor, who also noted that Obama was tops on the grasp of our U.S. Const.
            There is much more information on Obama and Trump, but I believe that we should wait for the U.S. Supreme Court to reply.

          • PAproFirearms

            Obama has kept his college records Private! Not “sealed” which needs a court order. However, the most (sic) transparent admin. in history is having some potential problems: TRUMP’s tax returns would be NOT understood my 99.9% of reporters who would attempt to tear them apart. I was NOT referring to Harvard attys’ with white guilt—just the majority of white lib. Dems! There are MANY pieces by black IMPORTANT folks who claim Obama is a sham!
            Again, let’s see what SCOTUS says about the 9th, as that was the ORIGINAL purpose of my reply!!! I say the 9th is politicized, you say otherwise. My ORIGINAL use of Obama’s name was merely to REPORT THE FACTS that he ALSO picked out those same seven nations to be vetted or restricted!

          • Lance Wakefield

            My college transcripts were also kept “private,” until I applied to Law School. They “liked” my transcripts, with a 3.27 G.P.A., so they accepted me. I believe that Obama had a much higher G.P.A. than I did, so he was accepted at a very highly rated and prestigious law school, that wouldn’t even consider a student of my “standing.” In other words, they have a very discriminatory policy, when it comes to applications for admission. I’m willing to bet that MOST of the Judges on the S.C. graduated from Harvard, Princeton or Yale’s law schools. I also believe that his L.S.A.T. scores were substantially higher than mine, or that would’ve kept him from gaining entry. I also have found that “Those who show promise,” would gain admittance, if they excelled during their 3 years of attendance, all money aside.
            Please “trust” my words, as I don’t have one damn thing to gain, by writing you any b.s.
            If there is anything else you’d like to question me on, please be my guest. Thank You!

          • PAproFirearms

            You have not discounted the fact that “just maybe” Obama got into Harvard with far lesser grades than you had due to his race OR standing as (potentially) a foreign student? The SCOTUS ruled against affirmative action for Univ. Mich undergrad acceptance for minorities (read black, not Jewish or Asian) but NOT for their Law School admissions, meaning if you were the ‘right’ minority, you got into U of M Law School with far lower grades due to your race. I am NOT disagreeing with you, just pointing out that “Scientifically,” there MAY be conditions that, while you are ASSUMING one set of circumstances, ANOTHER set was actually being utilized! I know that college transcripts are SUPPOSED to be private, but somebody “hacked” (Russians, LOL?) into “W”s Yale transcripts, and plastered them all over the internet. Later, in a funnier turn of events, somebody leaked Gore’s grades, and, while Bush was being called the DUMMY, it turned out that Gore had a LOWER GPA in LESS difficult courses! In a sensible move, Gore’s campaign stopped calling Bush a dummy, but the media never did! NOW, AGAIN, I will remind you that MY comments that even MENTIONED BHO’s name was due to the fact that Trump wanted to BAN and VET from the SAME COUNTRIES in the Middle East that BHO had planned to vet Immigrants from! The difference? Trump MUST be fought every step of the way! Obamacare is a FAILURE, was universally DISLIKED according to polls, what with premiums rising faster than Al Gore’s seas! (BAD simile—the seas are NOT rising hardly at all!) BUT, once Trump got elected and tried to make it better, all of a sudden Obamcare is next to God! THAT was the point I wanted to make, and, as you stated, SCOTUS will sort it out, AND, I notice that you didn’t refute the fact that “9th Circus” is overturned at an 86% rate! As an attorney, what would YOU call that level of incompetence? I know that, working in the medical field, that amount of “getting it WRONG” would lead to removal of one’s license!

          • Lance Wakefield

            Because I have no way of knowing what his “race” had to do with him “getting in” and “staying in.” Then I had another fact to deal with. That being the reason, or reasons, that Obama’s classmates elected him President of the Law Review. Why???
            Then, after he graduated from Harvard, why didn’t he go to work for any major law firm, for the huge bucks, rather than run to the streets of Chicago, to become a “community organizer?” Maybe I’m missing something here, that you are getting. This is just me talking, but I look more at the person, and less at their “grades.”
            I just want somebody in office who actually believes in the well being of the American people, NOT multi-national corporations.
            Going back to “W”s Yale transcripts, it is possible that someone in the record’s office, did the deed, as did someone in Gore’s alma mater.
            What I’m primarily concerned with at the moment, is WHY would
            Putin’s Russia want Trump in the “oval office,” rather than Hillary. What are the deep relationships embedded there? Or, does Russia want the BEST for the American people?
            Oh, final point. There is a major difference in “vetting people,” based on Nationality, vs. “banning people,” based on Nationality. The former is permissible under our Constitution.
            Thank You, for writing again, because I like to get different alternatives, just for comparison.

          • PAproFirearms

            And that was my point: NO WAY to know whether or not HOW he was selected for Law Review pres. As to the “American People,” personally, I feel that BHO was NOT that great for us! There is not enough money for all the hand-outs that the Dems want to ensure their continued elections, and Obamacare was designed to fail, so we could go single payer, and involve and ever burgeoning govt. in the business of deciding just who gets what for care! THEN you WILL see a separation of the “Classes” with Concierge service available for all who can afford it. Again, this is off subject: What you are telling me is that the 9th Circus is “Reading Trumps’s Mind” on his “Travel Ban.” That doesn’t seem to be “good, settled law” to me. Were it a Muslim ban, he would include many MORE countries. I do NOT want situations like happen in Europe and England occurring here. And, as I asked before, WHAT kind of a record of a Circuit Court is it when they are REVERSED 86% of the time?

          • Lance Wakefield

            Would you please tell me how the “9th Circus” could NOT be reading Trump’s mind, when he tells them outright, exactly what he wants to do, and the reason why?
            Second, the point is, he was. The reason why is irrelevant. His “fellow classmates” thought he fully deserved that “post,” so they elected him! And third, all I’ve seen Trump do, is serve Trump.
            Nothing for you or me, but “Do what you’re told, or you’ll be out in the street begging for a handout,” unless you are in the top 1% !
            I do deeply thank you for convincing me that I’m more in tune with “political thinking” at the present time, than you are. But, you will change as you learn. Many of my Medical Doctor friends, have told me that I have Trump, “Right On Target,”
            for who he is, and exactly what deceptions he’s up to.

          • PAproFirearms

            I assume you are a lawyer! I also was TOLD by attorneys that a law describes EXACT parameters, and is to be read as such. The 9th CiRCUS is “reading into the newest travel ban” language Trump used in the campaign. That is NOT LEGAL, but is their OVERREACH—I notice that you are NOT commenting on the 9th’s 86% REVERSAL rate!
            As to Trump: he was elected by the 99%, not the 1%–that is a typical liberal canard, OR, salve for their loss! Obama called the rest of the nation (between the coastal elites) “Flyover country, and called inhabitants “Bitter Clingers!” MORE reasons why he was worst POTUS to date. Had we even a 20% HONEST media, he never would’ve been re-elected!
            I do NOT know what type of physicians YOU are talking about/to, but all the ones I have mentioned say that ACA is a DISASTER! Since you are “assuming” that the 9th is “reading into Trump’s thoughts, please remember what Gruber said about the ACA AND the American voters! ALSO kindly remember that the ACA was DESIGNED TO FAIL, and, as we converse, it is STILL THE LAW OF THE LAND! I LOVE how Chucky (never met a camera I didn’t mug in front of!) Schumer is now saying the “GOP OWNS healthcare!” NOTHING has changed, unless the Senate gets THEIR act together, and that is doubtful. Again, ACA DESIGNED to get govt. running healthcare! WORST possible outccome! What WILL help costs is removing Med. device tax, AND, eliminating FRIVOLOUS malpractice suits! Something is TERRIBLY WRONG when the City of Philadelphia has MORE malpractice suits than the entire state of CA. (And Hollyweird is in CA–where entire careers are determined by plastic surgeons!) Again, I am NOT in the top 1%, and I know nobody personally is—except possibly two cousins—AND THEY voted for Clinton. You DO that many Trump voters voted AGAINST Clinton, don’t you? I assume you are wrong, and I thank YOU for convincing me I am on the Right Side! The LESS Govt. interference, in ANY situation, THE BETTER! Finally, PLEASE tell me WHERE, in EITHER Travel Ban, are the words “Muslim Ban!” And don’t forget to give me an intellectual and legal reason WHY 9th is overturned so much. Were they a business, they’d have FAILED long ago!

          • Lance Wakefield

            You are so “out of touch” with American reality, I don’t have the time or desire to continue any dialogue with you. You want to do yourself, and every average American, other than the top 1%, very great harm, and that is your privilege!
            Don’t bother me any more with YOUR nonsense!

          • PAproFirearms

            The JOKE is on YOU, Lance–but I have no problem not responding and wasting my time anymore, either! Good luck with SCOTUS ruling, and keep your head in the sand about medicine, the ACA, AND the 9th! Luckily, the American Reality ELECTED Trump! THANK GOD!

          • Lance Wakefield

            What a LIAR you ARE! Thank YOU JERK!

          • PAproFirearms

            What (sic) lies are you referring to? And thanks for resorting to the name calling—typical of losing libs! The world can now see you for what you are. Hint: nowhere NEAR as smart as you THINK you are! P.S.: My GPA was 3.92 in Chem and Bio!

    • Elena Bowman

      You evidently know nothing about the Constitution. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals DID NOT FOLLOW THE DICTATES OF THE CONSTITUTION. They made up their own laws according to their biases and political agenda. The Constitution FORBIDS THE ENTRY INTO THIS COUNTRY of any person or persons who are considered dangerous to this nation and since you are stupid enough to think that terrorists are NOT a menace to our country, then you are more of a menace to this country than the terrorists and the 9th Circuit Court are.

      • Lance Wakefield

        What do you do??? Obviously, you were NOT smart enough to “graduate” from kindergarten. Thank you for your magnificent logic!

  • Elena Bowman

    Split the 9th Circuit Court in half or in three’s. That court is an embarrassment to the country and they should be ashamed of themselves for putting terrorists before the citizens of this country. They have overstepped their bounds. Their job it to follow the Constitution of the United States not make laws that suit them and their political arena.